100+ Brands Featured
Search demand YoY
Biggest query gain
Biggest rank climb
Our reports have been the UK’s No.1 search marketing benchmark for the last 10 years! Marketing decision makers spanning 60 sectors have downloaded our reports to save over 72 hours of research and discover exactly how their brand ranks against the competition in search, visibility, and growth potential.
I was extremely impressed with the insight and depth of analysis in the Salience Report... The data-driven analysis tracking visibility, authority, links, page speed, search volume, keywords, and more paints a detailed picture of brand performance and emerging trends. The team was delighted to be featured.
The UK's No.1 Eyewear Industry Report
Across the 9,831 product keywords tracked in the 2026 Eyewear Salience Index, total UK search volume fell 13.7% year on year. 5,615 of those keywords lost volume. Only 2,209 gained. The decline is not spread evenly, and the pattern matters more than the headline figure.
The largest falls sit in the words that name the product itself. “Sunglasses” fell 12.7%, from 567,000 quarterly searches to 495,000. “Contact lenses” fell 18.2%. “Glasses” fell 5.9%. “Eyewear” fell 27.8%. The style and price language moved with them: the designer cluster fell 16.3%, the cheap cluster fell 20.5%, round frames fell 22.3%, square frames fell 25.3% and aviator fell 12.1%.
The queries holding up describe an activity, a condition or a physical constraint. We pulled the 589 keywords in that group and they fell only 6.2% against the market’s 13.7%, raising their share of total eyewear demand from 7.0% to 7.7%. Inside the group, “running sunglasses” rose 8.7%, “prescription running sunglasses” rose 26.2%, “hiking sunglasses” rose 48.9%, “fit over sunglasses” rose 49.5%, “multifocal eyeglasses” rose 106.5% and “photochromic glasses” rose 14.9%.
Two queries for the same product show the split most clearly. “Clip on sunglasses” fell 23.5%. “Clip on sunglasses for prescription glasses” rose 106.9%.
| Keyword | YoY Volume Change |
|---|---|
| Eyewear | -27.8% |
| Contact lenses | -18.2% |
| Sunglasses | -12.7% |
| Glasses | -5.9% |
| All 9,831 tracked keywords | -13.7% |
| Running sunglasses | +8.7% |
| Photochromic glasses | +14.9% |
| Prescription running sunglasses | +26.2% |
| Hiking sunglasses | +48.9% |
| Multifocal eyeglasses | +106.5% |
| Clip on sunglasses for prescription glasses | +106.9% |
Of the 251 UK eyewear sites in the traffic score table, 163 lost ground over twelve months and 76 gained. Specsavers holds first place on a traffic score of 1,904,154 and fell 12%. Vision Express holds second on 462,197, down 2%. Ray-Ban is third on 438,908, down 5%. Glasses Direct is fourth on 328,089 and rose 10%. Sunglass Hut is fifth on 272,458, up 2%. Boots Opticians enters the index in sixth place on 267,914.
Further down the table the moves are larger. Firmoo rose 54% to 101,336. SelectSpecs rose 39% to 54,730. RxSport rose 51% to 38,446 and climbed fifteen places to rank 16, the biggest rank move inside the top 20. Fashion Eyewear rose 44%. David Clulow rose 86%. Bollé rose 40%. The Optical Store rose 377% from a small base.
Concentration is rising underneath all of it. The top 20 sites raised their share of total traffic score from 82.2% to 84.3% in a year, so the sites that gained did so while the middle of the table lost volume.
| Brand | Rank | Traffic Score | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specsavers | 1 | 1,904,154 | -12% |
| Vision Express | 2 | 462,197 | -2% |
| Ray-Ban | 3 | 438,908 | -5% |
| Glasses Direct | 4 | 328,089 | +10% |
| Sunglass Hut | 5 | 272,458 | +2% |
| Boots Opticians | 6 | 267,914 | New entry |
Two groups of sports eyewear sites moved in opposite directions over the same twelve months. The sites named after the category itself, UK Sports Eyewear, Sunglasses For Sport, Sports Eyewear Direct and their peers, fell as a group from a combined traffic score of 13,508 to 5,555, a drop of 58.9%. The brands positioned around a use case rather than a category label, RxSport, Bollé, Julbo, SunGod and goodr among them, rose from 89,336 to 103,496, up 15.9%.
RxSport is the clearest single case. Its traffic score rose from 25,396 to 38,446, growth of 51%, and it climbed fifteen places to rank 16. Bollé rose 39.7%. Julbo rose 13.1%.
The fashion and designer houses tracked in the index moved the other way. Persol, Cubitts, Ace and Tate, Oliver Peoples, Mykita and IZIPIZI fell as a group from 141,347 to 103,618, down 26.7% across the year.
One caveat belongs with these figures. Traffic score is a modelled metric that estimates organic traffic from ranking positions and search volume, so these group comparisons sit alongside the keyword data rather than prove a cause. Two independent signals point the same way: demand moving out of product nouns and into constraint queries, and the brands built around those constraints gaining traffic score while category-named sites lose it.
Most eyewear category trees run Men, Women, Round, Aviator, Cat Eye, Designer. Every one of those clusters lost volume this year. The customer searching “prescription running sunglasses” has no landing page in that structure, and the queries naming a prescription, an activity or a fit constraint are the ones still growing.
Query length does not explain the split. We cut the full 9,831-keyword set by word count and the declines are almost identical at every length. One and two word queries fell 12.2%. Three word queries fell 15.0%. Four word queries fell 14.8%. Five word and longer queries fell 13.6%. The 4,053 keywords describing a look, a label or a price fell 16.7%, while the 589 describing a job, condition or activity fell 6.2%.
Prescription is the constraint with the sharpest growth, and most catalogues treat it as a checkout step rather than a route into the category. “Prescription running sunglasses” rose 26.2%. “Clip on sunglasses for prescription glasses” rose 106.9%. “Sunglasses to go over prescription glasses” rose 53.3%. “Multifocal eyeglasses” rose 106.5%. A customer who starts with a prescription requirement has to browse past every frame you sell before your site answers the question they arrived with.
The practical change is a navigation change. Build the category pages that answer the constraint, link them from the main navigation rather than filing them in a blog, and give each one the same internal linking and schema treatment the frame-shape pages already get.
The opportunity keyword table in the index scores monthly search volume against a competitiveness score out of 100, and the growing terms are consistently the cheaper ones to rank for.
“Photochromic glasses” carries 2,300 monthly searches at a competitiveness score of 4. “Varifocal contact lenses” carries 2,400 searches at 4. “Men’s glasses” carries 4,900 at 4. “Prescription safety glasses” carries 3,000 at 19. “Prescription sunglasses” carries 23,000 searches at 12.
Compare that with the head terms most eyewear teams put on the roadmap. “Glasses” scores 76. “Glasses online” scores 76. “Cheap glasses online” scores 78 on 6,800 searches. “Sunglasses” scores 63 and its volume fell 12.7% this year. Teams are competing hardest for the terms with falling volume and the highest cost of entry.
Keep the head terms. They still carry volume and they still carry brand recall. The question is where the next twenty pages go, and the opportunity table answers it with numbers rather than habit.
| Keyword | Monthly Searches | Competitiveness |
|---|---|---|
| Photochromic glasses | 2,300 | 4 |
| Varifocal contact lenses | 2,400 | 4 |
| Men’s glasses | 4,900 | 4 |
| Prescription sunglasses | 23,000 | 12 |
| Prescription safety glasses | 3,000 | 19 |
| Glasses | – | 76 |
| Cheap glasses online | 6,800 | 78 |
Generic product demand across the index fell 13.7%. Brand searches across the same tracked eyewear brands fell 7.9%. People are still typing brand names at close to last year’s rate while they type product nouns far less, and that gap is one reason the top 20 sites raised their share of total traffic score from 82.2% to 84.3%.
Four brands grew their brand search volume outright. Shade Station rose 30.5%. Specscart rose 22.7%. Asda Opticians rose 22.3%. Lensology rose 22.2%. Each of those is a rise in people searching a name directly, and branded demand is the one part of the query mix a competitor cannot rank against.
| Brand | Brand Search YoY | Vs -7.9% Brand Average |
|---|---|---|
| All tracked eyewear brands | -7.9% | – |
| Lensology | +22.2% | +30.1% |
| Asda Opticians | +22.3% | +30.2% |
| Specscart | +22.7% | +30.6% |
| Shade Station | +30.5% | +38.4% |
The full index covers prescription glasses, prescription sunglasses, contact lenses, sports eyewear, reading glasses, varifocals, blue light glasses and designer frames, with a table of UK opticians, online glasses retailers and eyewear brands ranked on traffic score, domain authority, referring domains, page speed, brand search volume, review scores and social reach.
This report is written for marketing leads, heads of ecommerce and search managers at UK eyewear brands, opticians and online glasses retailers who need to know exactly where they sit against Specsavers, Vision Express, Boots Opticians, Glasses Direct and Sunglass Hut.
It is built for the people who own a category tree and a content roadmap. The person deciding whether the next twenty pages cover frame shapes or prescription journeys. The person defending an organic forecast in a year when category demand fell 13.7%. The person who needs a competitor table their board will read without a translation layer.
If you sell prescription eyewear, contact lenses, sports eyewear or sunglasses in the UK, your brand is either in this table or measured against the brands that are.
There is a test you can run on your own data before you read a page of it. Pull your Search Console query report for the last twelve months. Split it into queries that name the product and queries that name a job, a condition or an activity. Look at the trend on each half. Then count how many category pages you own for the growing half.
The download is free, 68 pages, with competitive data on 251 UK eyewear sites.
Still scrolling? Here's the full 69-page report.
Download the free reportDigital performance reports covering 60+ industries within retail, finance and B2B.
