100+ Brands Featured
UK footwear brands tracked across 11 search and brand metrics.
Average organic traffic variance YoY.
YoY traffic growth for the biggest single mover in the dataset.
Our reports have been the UK’s No.1 search marketing benchmark for the last 10 years! Marketing decision makers spanning 60 sectors have downloaded our reports to save over 72 hours of research and discover exactly how their brand ranks against the competition in search, visibility, and growth potential.
I was extremely impressed with the insight and depth of analysis in the Salience Report... The data-driven analysis tracking visibility, authority, links, page speed, search volume, keywords, and more paints a detailed picture of brand performance and emerging trends. The team was delighted to be featured.
The UK's No.1 Footwear Report
The UK footwear search market moved -2% in twelve months (Mar 2025 to Mar 2026). That isn’t a contraction. It’s a flat year. Which makes the spread inside it the actual story: the top four brands all lost traffic, and one mid-market retailer gained nearly half a million monthly visits while its closest competitor lost half a million.
Look at the top of the league table. Every one of them shed visits.
Combined, those four lost 1,176,056 visits per month. Brand authority, scale, the biggest referring-domain footprints in the category, none of it provided protection. In a flat market, the giants got hit harder than the average brand. That should be uncomfortable reading for anyone who thinks domain strength is the moat.
| Brand | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | YoY change | vs Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sportsdirect.com | 5,342,510 | 5,119,100 | -4% | -2% |
| nike.com | 5,323,629 | 4,950,220 | -7% | -5% |
| jdsports.co.uk | 4,464,242 | 4,305,602 | -4% | -2% |
| adidas.co.uk | 3,892,519 | 3,471,922 | -11% | -9% |
If you want a single piece of evidence for what’s going on in UK footwear search, look at Office and Schuh.
They sell the same shoes. Same Nikes, same adidas, same Converse, same boots-with-the-fur. They market to the same kid in Manchester or Bristol shopping for trainers on a Saturday. Twelve months ago, the gap between them was 94,405 visits. Today it’s 1,094,137. An 11.59x widening in twelve months. Schuh added +467,557 visits. Office lost -532,175.
| Brand | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | YoY change | Absolute change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| schuh.co.uk | 1,811,386 | 2,278,943 | +26% | +467,557 |
| office.co.uk | 1,716,981 | 1,184,806 | -31% | -532,175 |
| Gap between them | 94,405 | 1,094,137 | 11.59x widening | |
The hype cluster lost ground. Sneaker-and-resale-culture brands took the biggest hits in the dataset.
Performance running and comfort footwear absorbed the displaced demand. The growth columns in the dataset are dominated by function, not flex.
The mechanism is straightforward. The hype cluster relied on cultural-moment search volume: releases, drops, collabs, resale. When the cultural moment cools, the search volume collapses with it. The performance and comfort cluster owns evergreen non-brand searches. “Best running shoes for plantar fasciitis.” “Wide-fit walking shoes.” “Cushioned trainers for nurses.” That stuff doesn’t go out of fashion when StockX’s audience moves on.
Converse is the third most recognised footwear brand in the UK. With 301,000 brand searches per month and an owned-social score of 103,902 (the third highest in the entire dataset), it ranks #3 on Salience’s combined Brand Awareness measure. In organic search, it ranks #23. That’s a 20-rank gap between recognition and visibility, and it’s the single most expensive blind spot we see in footwear marketing.
Recognition is built over decades; organic rank is built over months of disciplined keyword work. They compound differently. Nike (#1 awareness, #2 organic) is doing the work. adidas (#2 awareness, #4 organic) is mostly doing it. Sports Direct rakes it in by punching above its brand awareness, ranked #1 organic on a #5 awareness profile, by ranking for the keywords category-curious shoppers actually use. Converse isn’t doing any of that.
| Brand | Awareness Rank | Organic Rank | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| nike.com | #1 | #2 | +1 |
| adidas.co.uk | #2 | #4 | -2 |
| converse.com | #3 | #23 | -20 |
| jdsports.co.uk | #4 | #3 | +1 |
| sportsdirect.com | #5 | #1 | +4 |
The opposite pattern matters too. Charles Clinkard ranks well outside the Brand Awareness top 30, but its organic traffic grew +83% YoY, taking it from 83,022 monthly visits to 151,613, an absolute gain of 68,591 against a flat market. That’s proof that organic visibility belongs to whoever does the unglamorous keyword work, regardless of brand-search volume.
Charles Clinkard’s growth almost certainly comes from non-brand: fits, sizing guides, comfort categories, brand-stockist pages. Content that earns its position rather than inheriting it. The brand most people couldn’t pick out of a lineup is the clearest growth story in the top 100.
The top of the authority table reads almost identically to the top of the traffic table. Sports Direct, Nike, JD Sports, adidas, ASICS. That overlap isn’t a coincidence. The brands at the top earned their links over years, through PR, content, retail partnerships and category coverage.
But authority alone doesn’t immunise you. Nike has every measurable advantage in the category and is still bleeding 373,409 visits per month. The link profile is necessary, not sufficient. Without compounding content and topical authority, even a category-leading authority position can leak traffic at scale.
Two clusters in the dataset matter most.
These five brands have built strong link profiles but underperform on traffic. The on-site work, content depth, technical SEO, internal linking, isn’t matching the strength of their off-site signals. They’re the ones to watch in the next 12 months. If they fix the on-site gap, they have the authority to move quickly.
These five rank above their weight class. They’re winning organic traffic without the trusted-link footprint of the giants, almost certainly through technical SEO, content structure, and category-page depth. Foot Locker is the cleanest example. The lesson: a deep content layer can compensate for a thinner link profile, but the inverse isn’t true.
The pattern across both clusters tells the same story. Topical authority, the consistent, evergreen presence on the questions a category cares about, beats domain authority in the absence of new content investment. We’ve written more on why topical authority should sit at the core of any modern content strategy.
Most of footwear’s evergreen vocabulary is shrinking. Search volume for “shoes” dropped -18% YoY. “Mens trainers” fell -26%. “Football boots” -38%. “White trainers” -38%. “Wedding shoes” -38%. The category-anchor terms your strategy was probably built around are losing volume across the board.
The growth is hiding in tighter, sharper niches. Specificity is winning.
| Emerging keyword | Search volume | YoY trend |
|---|---|---|
| brown trainers womens | 9,900 | +61% |
| brown flip flops | 880 | +64% |
| square toe flip flops | 390 | +121% |
| paddle shoes | 260 | +132% |
| polka dot shoes | 320 | +193% |
| curling shoes | 1,600 | +5,812% |
None of these are mainstream category terms. None replace “trainers” in volume. But the results pages they trigger are PDPs rather than PLPs, and the purchase intent is natively higher in a category like this. They’re textbook opportunity: low competition, rising volume.
The 2026 Index ranks terms with high volume and low competition. If you’re not building category content for these, your competitors have a head start.
| Cluster | Monthly searches (UK) | Competitiveness score |
|---|---|---|
| Womens trainers | 56,000 | 14 |
| Slippers | 45,000 | 6 |
| Loafers | 43,000 | 3 |
| Golf shoes | 34,000 | 5 |
| School shoes | 32,000 | 5 |
| Walking boots | 30,000 | 9 |
Brand-search volume tells the second half of the story. ASICS is the only brand in the top 15 with growing brand-search demand (+6% YoY, against a category brand-search backdrop down 13 to 18% on average). That isn’t search marketing alone. Achieving that level of brand-search growth requires consistent investment across every channel: PR, social, offline advertising, customer experience that turns buyers into advocates who search by name.
Still scrolling? Here's the full 69-page report.
Download the free report
Digital performance reports covering 60+ industries within retail, finance and B2B.
